Test Website

Test results for http://www.day.com Test results from 8/27/2010 2:06:43 PM

Visited Links

Marking previously visited hyperlinks helps users to identify which pages of the website have previously been read. In other words, according to Nielsen the navigation interface should answer three essential questions: "Where am I?", "Where have I been?" and "Where can I go?"

Source and further information:
"Prioritizing Web Usability" by Jakob Nielsen/Hoa Loranger and "Designing Web Usability" by Jakob Nielsen

The tested website does not support fully this type of marking.

Resizable Fonts

Not all visually impaired people make use of technical support to navigate on the internet. The feature to increase fonts is an important element to ensure that all information of the website can be read by all users. Even people who are not visually impaired need to increase the font sometimes. At the same time, an increasing number of older people surf the web; they too need a feature to increase the font. To this purpose, it is important to define the font size not in pixel, but in percentage or "em".

Source and further information:
"Prioritizing Web Usability" by Jakob Nielsen/Hoa Loranger

The font on the tested website cannot be increased and defined with the automated browser feature "Text Size".

Suboptimal Target

When clicking on a link, web users expect to see the new page in the existing window. Most users lose control if there are several windows open, are unable to navigate back with the back function and get lost. At the same time, and this is particularly true for old computers, the system can get overloaded and crash if too many browser windows open. If new windows open but are not seen by the user, the perception is that the website does not work properly. Experienced users who want to open new windows know how to do this by using the function "Open (link) in New Window", or with similar comands.

There is one important exception to this rule: files in .PDF or other Office format can be opened in new windows. Users know to close them to return to the original window. In this case, users should be informed that a new window opened, and they should be given the opportunity to save the file.

Technical hint: For XHTML Strict in particular, there is the possibility to send a .PDF file with ContentType "application/pdf" and HTTP Header content-disposition: attachment; filename=filename.pdf, since there is no target attribute. This test does not take it into account yet, but this is a feasible solution.

Source and further information:
"Prioritizing Web Usability" by Jakob Nielsen/Hoa Loranger

At least one Office file was found which did not open in a new window.

*** Members only ***

This test result is available for registered users and Premium Members.
More than two thirds of the test results will be available to you once registration has been successfully completed.

To have full access to the test results, and to be notified about changes in quality of the observed website, please register and upgrade to Premium Membership.

Register now free of charge

A potential warning has been identified.

Adjacent Links

Accessibility guideline 10.5 for web content 1.0 W3C, dated 5th May 1999 states: "Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render adjacent links distinctly, include non-link, printable characters (surrounded by spaces) between adjacent links." http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT.

This means that subsequent links should be separated by a printable, non hyper-linked and free-standing character. The prolem is easily solved by using a navigation list for the links <ul>. Additional characters can be added with CSS.

Further information:
http://www.vorsprungdurchwebstandards.de/theory/accessibility-nach-vorschrift/;
http://de.selfhtml.org/html/text/listen.htm

Many subsequent links insufficiently kept apart have been found on the tested web site.

MyRating: Test Website

Test Website
The quality of a website defines the success on the internet, also in economical terms. Score points on the Qualidator (from Quality Validator) and bring the potential of your website to life.

The Qualidator reviews the first five pages of a website with about 60-70 automated tests, on the core aspects of usability, accessibility, SEO (Search Engines Optimisation) and quality (technical quality).

Please introduce the URL/address of a website. Example: www.microsoft.com.
The test will last between one and five minutes, depending on the website and server load.

Qualidator News

October 2010: HTTP Compression Test

HTTP Compression of HTML, JavaScript and CSS can now be tested directly in SiteAnalyzer. Different User Agents are available in order to test the proper behavior.
June 2010: Qualidator for SmartPhones

Qualidator.com has been optimized for the iPhone and other SmartPhones in the last few month. Check it out. Feedback welcome.
october 2009

Do you already know the Qualidator® SiteAnalyzer?
The Qualidator® SiteAnalyzer is a Windows application, developed to allow a one step, page by page, automated validation of an entire web project (XHTML & CSS), and to review the quality by carrying out over 30 additional tests.
october 2009

Qualidator.com with Alexa Traffic Rank 16'605!
august 2009

Follow us on Twitter
august 2009

Free Tools for you on qualidator.com
august 2009

Qualidator.com in english ready! After two very successfull years in the german speaking area we are proud to welcome you in english.

Recommendation: Uptime Monitoring

Recommendation: HTML2PDF Rendering Service

Key Benefits
  • Renders URLs of (dynamic)(x)html pages including CSS to PDF on the fly
  • html2pdf is a Service NOT a class library or EXE
  • Very easy to use

Tell me more about the HTML2PDF Rendering Service

Partner

  • SwissMadeSoftware
  • ZTPrentner IT
Copyright © 2009 seven49.net GmbH
Quelle: http://www.qualidator.com/WQM/en/TestWebsite/http_www.day.com/Report3513923/ResultCode8.aspx